How to Submit a Book Review on Acs Publications

ACS Case Reviews in Surgery publishes example reports in various surgical specialties. All case reports must run into the following requirements:

• Focus on a topic of interest to practicing surgeons
• Describe experiences that may non be routinely seen or that were uniquely treated
• Involve patients with mutual surgical issues (where the clinical presentation and/or challenges of management produced noesis and insights that have educational value)

Only original, previously unpublished case report manuscripts should be submitted. All submissions volition exist reviewed with the understanding that the submitted piece of work has not been published past and is non under publication consideration at any other periodical, website, or whatsoever other content platforms. Additionally, all manuscripts will exist peer-reviewed.

Authors are encouraged to review the author instructions in their entirety every bit well every bit a sample example report.

Submitted case reports should be approximately 1,000 words (four pages), including the case description. Please run across Give-and-take Count under the Case Written report Submission Checklist department for more details. All manuscript formatting requirements must be strictly followed; all designated manuscript sections must be included, including the provision of an abstract, example description, discussion, conclusion, and lessons learned statement.

Medical students and residents are encouraged to submit to ACS Instance Reviews in Surgery; however, in order to do so, a practicing surgeon/attending surgeon must be included as one of the case report authors.

Delight annotation: Upon receiving a written acceptance for publication notification via e-mail, the respective author volition be required to pay a nonnegotiable $750 publication fee.

Manuscript Format

Title Page

Title

The title folio must exist the first folio of the manuscript; all pages should be numbered. The title of manuscript should include the report'due south key concepts so that search engines will locate the manuscript. No abbreviations are allowed in titles, unless they are standard acronyms (for instance, NSQIP).

Author Names and Affiliations

Listing the proper name(due south) of all authors, including first name and middle initial, graduate degrees of authors, and FACS if writer(s) are Fellows of the ACS. No more than 10 names volition appear under the championship. Where the family unit name may be ambiguous (for example, a double proper noun), please clearly indicate this.

Present the authors' amalgamation addresses (where the bodily work was done) beneath the names. Bespeak all affiliations with a lower-case superscript letter immediately after the author's name and in front of the appropriate affiliation.

Provide the full affiliation for each author, including department and institution, metropolis, and state.

Additional contributors should exist listed in an acknowledgments section on the title page (for example, people who provided purely technical assist/writing assistance, section chairs who provided merely general back up, etc.)

Correspondence Address

Clearly indicate who will handle correspondence at all stages of review, revision, publication, and postpublication. Simply one respective writer is allowed. Ensure that a valid phone number (with country and area code) is provided in improver to the east-mail service accost and the consummate postal address. Contact details must exist kept upwardly to appointment by the corresponding author.

Present/Permanent Accost

If an writer has moved since the work described in the article was done, or was visiting at the time, a "Present address" (or "Permanent address") may be indicated as a footnote to that author's name. The accost at which the author really did the work must be retained as the main affiliation address.

Meeting Presentation

Include meeting presentation data: the name (spelled out) of the sponsoring system, city and state, and month and year of the meeting.

Disclosure of Conflicts

All relevant conflicts of interest and sources of funding should be included on the championship page of the manuscript with the heading "Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding." See Conflict of Interest below for farther details.

Abstract

Structured abstracts are required. Abstract should comprise virtually 300-500 words. Briefly summarize the article by stating the research focus, the research methods used, the results/findings, and any problems presented by the example, lessons learned, conclusion(s), and recommendations. Do not cite references in the abstract. The format for the abstract is:

• Groundwork
• Summary
• Determination
• Cardinal Words

Immediately later on the decision, provide a maximum of 6 (6) keywords, using American spelling and avoiding general and plural terms and multiple concepts (avoid, for example, "and", "of"). These keywords will be used for indexing and searching purposes.

Case Clarification

Abbreviations

Abbreviations/acronyms should exist in parentheses immediately after the words for which they stand, and must be spelled out completely at first use in the abstract and again at first use in the text. Abbreviations/acronyms used in figures must be spelled out in the figure legend. Up to 10 abbreviations of mutual terms (for example, DCIS, HBV, TIA) or acronyms (for example, SPECT, TRISS, SEER) may be used throughout the manuscript. On a separate page after the abstruse, listing the selected abbreviations and their definitions (for example, DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ). The editors volition determine which lesser-known terms should non be abbreviated.

Units and Drug Names

Follow internationally accepted rules and conventions: utilize the international arrangement of units (SI). If other units are mentioned, please give their equivalent in SI.
Generic names should be used for drugs, with trade name and company in parentheses. Do non use patient names, initials, or hospital numbers.

Figures and Illustrations

• Submit manuscripts as Microsoft Word files.
• Provide all art every bit files separately in highest quality format bachelor too as embedding visuals in the manuscript to indicate final placement. Adequate fine art file formats are: JPG, PNG, GIF, PDF, PSD, and AI. Graphics should be supplied at a resolution 72 dpi or higher and equivalent or larger dimensions for placement in the manuscript.
• Apply a logical naming convention for your artwork files.
• Artwork can exist black and white or color.
• Apply the Arial font and uniform text size in illustration(s).
• Use arrows wherever necessary for clarity. Arrows should exist included as visuals in the in-text artwork to indicate points of reference but NOT in the high-quality art files fastened separately. The ACS Case Reviews in Surgery staff will adapt as needed to comply with our standard formatting.
• All artwork should include explanatory text, particularly a caption and a fable, that succinctly describes the illustrations. When arrows are used, explain each arrow clearly in the legend and spell out all abbreviations.
• Number all figures within the manuscript consecutively (according to their sequence in the text) with Arabic numerals. Label figure parts "A" and "B", etc., in bolded Arial font.
• Explain, if necessary, the internal scale, and identify the method of staining in photomicrographs.

Delight note: If any included artwork has been previously published (either by y'all or by other authors, regardless of their involvement in your case report), obtain publication permission and land the permission fully in the artwork legend. Submit the artwork permission approval letter with the signed projection agreement class.

Tables

Submit tables as part of the manuscript certificate, at the end subsequently the reference listing. Tables should be submitted in "table editor" format within the discussion-processed certificate (not in PDF or graphics format), and they should non use tabs or spaces to separate columns. If a table is large or exceedingly complex, the author should consider separating the information into 2 or more simpler tables. Submit no more than five tables, on separate pages, and number tables in Standard arabic numbers consecutively in social club of text citation. Provide a brief title. Each cavalcade must have a heading. Put all explanatory affair in footnotes, including an explanation for all nonstandard abbreviations used in table. For every key symbol used in the table (*,†, ‡, §, ||, ¶, #, **, ††, ‡‡, §§, etc.) make sure a corresponding footnote is included.

If a tabular array contains information from previously published cloth, published by you lot or by others, obtain written permission and acknowledge fully in the tabular array footnote. Upload the permission letter with the manuscript submission.

Figure Legends

Supply legends separately at the stop of the manuscript file, not attached to the figure. The figure itself should not include a championship. A fable should brainstorm with a brief title and a description of the illustration. Go on text in the illustrations to a minimum.

Number the figures consecutively with Arabic numbers. Label figure parts "A" and "B", etc., in Arial bold font. When symbols, arrowheads, or letters identify parts of an illustration, explain each clearly in the fable and spell out all abbreviations. Explain, if necessary, the internal scale, and identify the method of staining in photomicrographs.

If a figure has been previously published, by you or by others, obtain permission and country the permission fully in the effigy legend. Upload the permission letter of the alphabet with the signed project agreement form.

Discussion

This department should include a brief review of the literature too as a give-and-take of the management and decision making involved in the case. Demonstrating an understanding of the existing literature related to the case written report topic is also highly encouraged. The discussion section should besides evaluate the patient case for accuracy, validity, and uniqueness; compare and contrast the instance report with the published literature; derive new knowledge; summarize the essential features of the report; and draw recommendations.

Decision

Briefly reiterate prove-based recommendations and applicability to surgical practice.

Lessons Learned

Authors must provide a brief 1- to three-sentence summary of essential points, statements, or facts (non to exceed 50 words) summarizing the findings of their manuscript. If the article is accepted, it volition appear in the table of contents.

References

If automated reference numbering software (such as EndNote) or bibliography software is used, turn it off before submitting the manuscript.

Commendation in Text

Please ensure that every reference cited in the text is also present in the reference list (and vice versa). Any references cited in the abstruse must be given in total. Unpublished results and personal communications are not recommended in the reference listing, only they may be mentioned in the text. Citation of a reference every bit 'in press' implies that the item has been accustomed for publication. In-text citations should appear as superscript numbers.

Reference Links

Increased discoverability of enquiry and high quality peer review are ensured by online links to the sources cited. In order to allow us to create links to abstracting and indexing services, such as Scopus, CrossRef and PubMed, please ensure that data provided in the references are correct. Please note that incorrect surnames, journal/book titles, publication year and pagination may prevent link cosmos. When copying references, delight be careful every bit they may already contain errors. Use of the DOI is encouraged.

Reference Style

ALL references should follow the AMA format.

Number consecutively in the club mentioned in text. The citation number is placed in the text after the proper noun when the reference is cited; if no name is mentioned, the commendation is placed in the text at the end of the fabric referred to (for case, "Meakins and Jones13 have shown that..." and "A group of oncologists has proved that if….13"). References to manuscripts accepted simply not published at fourth dimension of submission tin can be designated in the format shown in this example: "J Am Coll Surg. In printing 2008." Personal communication is cited within the text, not in references. Authors must obtain written permission and confirmation of accurateness from the source of personal communication earlier submission. References must be verified against original documents; authors are responsible for completeness and accuracy of all citations.

The reference list should follow the text, and begin on a divide page, double-spaced and numbered consecutively. If at that place are more than six authors, listing the showtime three authors, followed by et al. If there are six authors or fewer than six, list all authors.

Order of reference parts for a periodical article: [Authors]. [Title]. [Journal name] [Year];[Volume]:[Pages].

Instance: Valabussa P, Bonadonna G, Veronesi U. Patterns of relapse and survival post-obit radical mastectomy. Cancer. 1978;41:1170-1178.

Case Report Submission Checklist

Please use this list to deport out a terminal check of your case report before you submit it for review.

Ensure that the post-obit items are present:

Contact Information

Clearly indicate who volition handle correspondence at all stages of review, revision, publication, and post-publication. Only one author is allowed to be designated as the respective author, with the following contact details provided:

• Valid e-mail service accost
• Complete postal address
• Valid telephone number (with country and area lawmaking)

Contact details must be kept upwardly to engagement by the respective author.

All Necessary Files Have Been Submitted

• Include keywords
• Include all figures (include relevant captions) and permissions statements, when applicative
• Include all tables (including titles, description, footnotes) and permissions statements, when applicable
• Ensure all figure and table citations in the text match the files provided

Further Considerations

• Manuscript has been "spell checked" and "grammar checked"
• All references mentioned in the References are cited in the text, and vice versa
• Permission has been obtained for employ of copyrighted material from other sources (including the Cyberspace)
• Relevant declarations of interest have been made
• Periodical policies detailed in this guide have been reviewed

If you accept any questions, delight contact the ACS Case Reviews in Surgery editorial team at casereviews@facs.org.

Discussion Count

Every bit stated previously, we highly recommend submitting case reports that are no longer than four pages (approximately 1,000 words). That said, the ultimate goal of ACS Case Reviews in Surgery is to provide admission to unique and in-depth analyses of actual surgical cases. In add-on, this innovative, peer-reviewed periodical will provide surgeons with opportunities to learn effective surgical approaches and provide the highest quality of service and intendance to patients. Therefore, every bit long as the submitted case report accomplishes these goals, we volition go out the terminal report length to the discretion of the author(south).

Images

Photographs/10-rays: Photographs and X-rays are encouraged, as long every bit all identifying data has been removed or blacked out.

Videos: At this time, videos will not be able to be included.

Figures/Charts/Graphs/Tables/Illustrations: If the author(south) would similar to include tables, illustrations, charts, figures, or graphs that require permission, delight submit the granted permission(s) with the example study.

How to Submit Case Reports

Editors of ACS Case Reviews in Surgery volition review each submission and determine if it is appropriate for publication in this journal. All case reports will be checked for plagiarism prior to publication. If accepted for publication, edits and/or recommendations will exist sent to the authors, forth with a request for changes. Once accepted, the case study volition be considered the belongings of the American College of Surgeons, subject to all applicative copyright laws, and non publishable once more in any form.

ACS Case Reviews in Surgery Instance Report Submission Steps

1. The corresponding author will submit their instance report on the ACS Case Reviews in Surgery submission platform . Authors must accept a ScholarOne Manuscript user account to go along. Submissions that arrive by electronic mail will not exist processed for review.
2. The EIC will conduct a preliminary review of the manuscript to make up one's mind whether to take the submitted instance study for initial review. If the manuscript is rejected, no appeals or resubmissions volition be permitted.
3. After the initial review, the case study editor will decide whether to reject the case study, accept it, or request revisions by the author. Corresponding authors will be notified via eastward-postal service regarding the status of their submitted study. If the case written report needs to be revised, authors will be provided with copies of the completed review forms.
4. The corresponding author will be given a deadline of fourteen days to submit their requested instance study revisions. The upload should include the revised instance written report (with tracked changes implemented and/or the revised sections highlighted in yellow) and an explanatory cover letter that details the exact revisions that were made per the revision recommendations. If the corresponding author cannot see this deadline, or if the manuscript revisions are not conspicuously delineated, then the case report will exist immediately rejected.
5. If the submitted case report is approved for publication, the corresponding writer will be notified via e-post. The corresponding author will also be sent an ACS Project Agreement/Financial Disclosure form to review, sign, engagement, and submit to casereviews@facs.org . At the same time, the corresponding author will be required to pay a $750 publication fee for the approved instance report as well as submit canonical permissions statements for whatever copyrighted/previously published materials, including, but non limited to, figures, charts, tables, graphs, and illustrations.
6. Prior to publication, the corresponding author will exist east-mailed a final proof of the case study; special attention should be given to the correct presentation of writer names. It is the responsibility of the corresponding writer to ensure that all authors listed in the manuscript agree with how their names appear in the terminal proof. Formatting changes, grammar changes, and routine rephrasing of sentences or additions will not be permitted. Alteration recommendations should be restricted to serious changes in interpretation or corrections of data. Additionally, the respective author volition accept upwardly to 48 hours to recommend any content alterations. Later on 48 hours, the content will be considered final. All changes are field of study to editorial review and approval.
7. One time the corresponding author approves the case study proof, it will be submitted for publication.
8. After the instance report has been published, the corresponding writer volition be contacted via electronic mail with a PDF of their newly published work.

Conflict of Interest

In accordance with ACCME regulations, the American College of Surgeons must ensure that anyone who is in a position to control the content of ACS Case Reviews in Surgery has disclosed all relevant fiscal relationships with any commercial interest, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest as it pertains to the content of their contribution. All authors must disclose any financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence (bias) their piece of work using the ACS Case Reviews in Surgery Disclosure Course/Project Understanding grade. Yous are requested to identify who provided fiscal back up for the conduct of the research and/or preparation of the article and to briefly describe the role of the sponsor(southward), if whatsoever, in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the study; and in the conclusion to submit the article for publication. If the funding source(southward) had no such involvement so this should be stated. Examples of potential conflicts of involvement include employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid skillful testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other funding. If none of the authors has any financial relationships to disclose, ane disclosure form may be submitted for all authors. If any author has financial relationships to disclose, and then a split up disclosure form must be submitted for each author. Failure or refusal to disembalm or the disability to resolve the identified conflict will result in the withdrawal of your contribution.

Author(south) are strongly advised to not submit any content or other materials that compete with the work products covered past the ACS Project Agreement. Further, any and all authors will agree that ideas and materials adult by other group members and submitted to ACS for publication will not exist used for any other purpose, particularly every bit described by the ACS Project Agreement. Additionally, authors volition not develop materials that are similar to or would compete with the projection covered by the ACS Project Agreement.

Statement on Duplicate Publication

Submission of an article implies that the work described has non been published previously, that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is canonical by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accustomed, information technology will non exist published elsewhere including electronically in the same form, in English or in whatsoever other language, without the written consent of the copyright holder.

When submitting a paper, the author must always make a consummate statement to the editor about all submissions and previous reports (including meeting presentations and posting of results in registries) that might be regarded equally redundant or indistinguishable publication. The writer must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about which the authors have published a previous report or have submitted a related report to some other publication. Any such report must be referred to and referenced in the new newspaper. Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to assist the editor determine how to handle the matter.

If redundant or duplicate publication is attempted or occurs without such notification, authors should expect editorial activeness to exist taken. At the least, prompt rejection of the submitted manuscript should be expected. If the editor was non aware of the violations and the article has already been published, and then a observe of redundant or duplicate publication will probably be published with or without the author's caption or approval.

Confidentiality

In club to protect and maintain the confidentiality of any ACS projects, authors will agree not to brand copies of, disclose, talk over, describe, distribute, or disseminate in any manner whatsoever, including in any oral, written, or electronic form, whatsoever data discussed, developed, or disseminated in conjunction with the instance written report. Case report content volition non be used for personal or professional person benefit or for any other reason, except directly in conjunction with the terms of the ACS Project Understanding. Authors volition take reasonable steps to protect the confidential nature of this matter and to dispose of all materials and notes regarding such confidential information in a mode consistent with confidential information. In the issue that the authors receive questions well-nigh the ACS projection, the author will agree to directly all questions, concerns, or inquiries to the College'southward staff. The author will admit that ACS will be irreparably harmed and that the author shall have no adequate remedy at law for any breach of this provision.

Authorship

In accordance with the Consensus Statement on Surgery Journals Authorship-2006, all authors should have made substantial contributions to all three of the following: (1) the conception and pattern of the study, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of information, (2) drafting the article or revising information technology critically for important intellectual content, (3) concluding approval of the version to be submitted.

Each writer should have participated sufficiently in the piece of work to take public responsibility for appropriate portions of the content. Allowing one'southward name to appear as an author without having contributed significantly to the study or calculation the name of an individual who has not contributed or who has not agreed to the work in its current form is considered a breach of advisable authorship.

Human being Rights

If the piece of work involves the use of human subjects, the writer should ensure that the piece of work described has been carried out in accordance with The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Clan (Proclamation of Helsinki) for experiments involving humans; Uniform Requirements for manuscripts submitted to Biomedical journals. Authors should include a statement in the manuscript that informed consent was obtained for experimentation with human subjects. The privacy rights of human subjects must ever be observed.

Informed Consent

Patients have a right to privacy that should non be infringed without informed consent. Identifying information, including patients' names, initials, or hospital numbers, volition not exist published in written descriptions, photographs, and pedigrees unless the data is essential for scientific purposes and the patient (or parent or guardian) gives written informed consent for publication. Informed consent for this purpose requires that a patient who is identifiable exist shown the manuscript to exist published. Authors should identify individuals who provide writing assistance and disclose the funding source for this aid.

Nonessential identifying details should be omitted. Informed consent should be obtained if at that place is any doubt that anonymity tin be maintained. For example, masking the eye region in photographs of patients is inadequate protection of anonymity. If identifying characteristics are de-identified, authors should provide balls that such changes do not distort scientific meaning.

When informed consent has been obtained it will be indicated in the published commodity.

lasterwastold1981.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.facs.org/publications/case-reviews/authors

Share this post